Summary
reasoning that, where one or more of the plaintiffs have standing to raise the matters presented on appeal, we will address the merits
Summary of this case from Milne v. City of CanbyOpinion
September 18, 1979.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 18, 1979
287 Or. 409 (Or. 1979)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 18, 1979
287 Or. 409 (Or. 1979)
reasoning that, where one or more of the plaintiffs have standing to raise the matters presented on appeal, we will address the merits
Summary of this case from Milne v. City of Canbyreasoning that, "[b]ecause one or more of the plaintiffs have standing to raise all of the matters which are presented by their appeal, we turn to the merits"
Summary of this case from Just v. City of Lebanonreasoning that, where one or more of the plaintiffs have standing to raise the matters presented on appeal, we will address the merits.
Summary of this case from Barton v. City of LebanonCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Sep 18, 1979
Citations
287 Or. 409 (Or. 1979)
Citing Cases
Warren v. Lane County
If Cole does have standing before LUBA, we find no allegations in the petition that Cole could not pursue…
United Citizens v. Environmental Quality CommRespondents do not challenge Phegley's and Osburn's standing to seek review. In view of that and the fact…