holding that, having ejected an intoxicated patron from its restaurant, the defendant put the victim in a vulnerable position and reasonably should have foreseen the likelihood of a criminal assault by an unknown third person
Summary of this case from State v. Jensen1999.
holding that, having ejected an intoxicated patron from its restaurant, the defendant put the victim in a vulnerable position and reasonably should have foreseen the likelihood of a criminal assault by an unknown third person
Summary of this case from State v. Jensenholding that initial responsibility cannot be assigned to an out-of-state employer
Summary of this case from Saif v. Henwooddiscussing burden
Summary of this case from Raytheon Constructors v. Toboladeclining to rule on sufficiency of the evidence to warrant submission to the jury of a request for punitive damages where a new evidentiary record would be created on remand
Summary of this case from Fujitsu Microelectronics, Inc. v. Lam Research Corp.applying Bucholz in holding that the defendant had failed to preserve challenge to trial court's failure to make specific findings of fact supporting imposition of consecutive sentences
Summary of this case from Bacote v. JohnsonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1999
The rule is a "rule of proof" in that it can be used to establish that a claim is compensable by proving that…
In the Matter, Compensation of ChristmanClaimant's next two assignments of error concern the last injurious exposure rule. In Reynolds Metals v.…