holding that the trial court correctly denied the defendant's motions for directed verdict and for jnov when the jury could have concluded from the evidence that the defendant knowingly made false statements that the plaintiff was a thief
Summary of this case from Bendl v. ParksDecember 4, 1984.
holding that the trial court correctly denied the defendant's motions for directed verdict and for jnov when the jury could have concluded from the evidence that the defendant knowingly made false statements that the plaintiff was a thief
Summary of this case from Bendl v. Parksdetermining that, unlike plants that might be on a front porch, marijuana plants on a back porch were not in an area subject to implied permission to enter
Summary of this case from State v. Goldbergrelating the factual background, including that the allegedly defamatory statements were spoken in a staff meeting, without verbatim quotes of the statements
Summary of this case from Lowell v. Wrightexplaining that officers trespassed when, after knocking on the front door and receiving no response, they entered the defendant's backyard, because officers lacked consent and "[n]either the warrant nor their status as peace officers gave them any greater right to intrude onto defendant's property than any other stranger would have"
Summary of this case from Box v. Statenoting that "aggravated murder is the most serious offense under the criminal code"
Summary of this case from State v. Linknoting that an officer ordinarily may not approach the side or rear of a home without a warrant or some other legal justification
Summary of this case from State v. BakerFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Dec 4, 1984
When considering a warrantless entry onto the curtilage of private property, an officer's status as law…
State v. PierceApproaches to points on the property other than a front door, however, are generally not regarded as being…