Summary
holding that the availability of pretrial criminal discovery is generally sufficient to cure imprecision in charging instruments
Summary of this case from State v. BurnsOpinion
November 22, 2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 22, 2000
331 Or. 334 (Or. 2000)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 22, 2000
331 Or. 334 (Or. 2000)
holding that the availability of pretrial criminal discovery is generally sufficient to cure imprecision in charging instruments
Summary of this case from State v. Burnsconcluding that recklessly endangering another person was a lesser included offense of attempted aggravated murder when the indictment alleged that the defendant intentionally attempted to cause the victim’s death by firing shots into a van loaded with occupants, because that "alleged conduct could have been prompted by an intent to cause the death of the driver, or it could describe a reckless act by defendant that created a substantial risk of physical injury to the driver but did not injure him"
Summary of this case from State v. GallowayCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Nov 22, 2000
Citations
331 Or. 334 (Or. 2000)
Citing Cases
York v. Paakkonen
Plaintiff's assignment of error presents questions of law, and we therefore review for errors of law. Wade v.…
Trotter v. SantosWe turn to defendant's argument that it did not. We rejected similar arguments in the context of direct…