concluding that, although "petitioner did not repeat the words of the statute and say that she had been subjectively alarmed" the court could "infer from her testimony, in light of the nature of respondent’s contacts * * * that she was in fact alarmed," and that "it was objectively reasonable for petitioner to be alarmed"
Summary of this case from M. D. O. v. DeSantisMarch 7, 2001
concluding that, although "petitioner did not repeat the words of the statute and say that she had been subjectively alarmed" the court could "infer from her testimony, in light of the nature of respondent’s contacts * * * that she was in fact alarmed," and that "it was objectively reasonable for petitioner to be alarmed"
Summary of this case from M. D. O. v. DeSantislooking to the dictionary definition of contact to determine whether the respondent's actions constituted a prohibited contact
Summary of this case from State v. Westomexplaining that contacts might appear “innocuous * * * in isolation” but “take on a different character * * * in combination or against the backdrop of one party's assaultive behavior,” and holding that, in the context of the respondent's history of violence and abusive behavior towards his family, the petitioner's alarm and apprehension for her personal safety was objectively reasonable
Summary of this case from C.J.R. v. Flemingsuppressing evidence found during an inventory after arresting the defendant for driving under the influence and ordering a tow of the vehicle
Summary of this case from State v. WalkerFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Mar 7, 2001
Second, the other person may be unaware of a contact or a series of contacts, but when the person later…
Wanjala v. United StatesSubrogation permits an insurer in certain instances to recover what it has paid to its insured, "in effect,…