relying on commentary to an earlier version of UIFSA to inform the meaning of the corresponding Oregon statute and noting that "[w]hen a statute has been enacted in response to federal legislation, that legislation is relevant to determining the intended meaning of the state enactment"
Summary of this case from Vaughn v. VaughnOctober 21, 2003
relying on commentary to an earlier version of UIFSA to inform the meaning of the corresponding Oregon statute and noting that "[w]hen a statute has been enacted in response to federal legislation, that legislation is relevant to determining the intended meaning of the state enactment"
Summary of this case from Vaughn v. Vaughntreating commentary on a uniform act as part of the act's legislative history
Summary of this case from In re Marriage of Mayfieldstating same in context of different uniform act
Summary of this case from Dep't of Human Servs. v. J. S. (In re V. B. N. S.)noting that the exercise of the government's police power is "not compensable taking[] of `private property for public use' under Article I, section 18"
Summary of this case from Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon v. Posh Ventures, LLCconsidering commentary to Uniform Interstate Family Support Act as legislative history of the relevant Oregon counterpart
Summary of this case from In re Rudderstating that UIFSA official commentary constitutes legislative history
Summary of this case from In the Matter of Marriage of CalvertFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Oct 21, 2003
The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion and the Oregon Supreme Court denied review. State v.…
Vaughn v. VaughnAnd, as the trial court observed, the commentary to the UIFSA informs its meaning in a manner much like…