Summary
holding that cowboy boots can be dangerous weapons under ORS 161.015, depending on how they are used
Summary of this case from Eby v. PremoOpinion
June 7, 1989.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 7, 1989
308 Or. 142 (Or. 1989)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jun 7, 1989
308 Or. 142 (Or. 1989)
holding that cowboy boots can be dangerous weapons under ORS 161.015, depending on how they are used
Summary of this case from Eby v. Premoreasoning that a defendant's violation of the same criminal statute at different times were separate offenses; finding no violation of ORS 131.515 because “[d]efendant was charged twice for identical offenses, not twice for the same offense”
Summary of this case from State v. Hamel-Spencertreating affidavit in support of untimely cross-motion for summary judgment as affidavit in opposition to motion for summary judgment
Summary of this case from Citibank South Dakota v. Santororelying on Knowles and Yock
Summary of this case from State v. TosteCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jun 7, 1989
Citations
308 Or. 142 (Or. 1989)
Citing Cases
State v. Stolz
Even if some details of defendant's violation of the restraining order are admissible at trial on the…
State v. Holcomb" 88 Or App at 274. In State v. Roe, 95 Or. App. 477, 770 P.2d 69, rev den 308 Or. 142 (1989), there was a…