Summary
determining whether an easement term was ambiguous as a question of law
Summary of this case from Stone v. CCXL, LLCOpinion
September 24, 2002
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 24, 2002
334 Or. 631 (Or. 2002)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 24, 2002
334 Or. 631 (Or. 2002)
determining whether an easement term was ambiguous as a question of law
Summary of this case from Stone v. CCXL, LLCaffirming a directed verdict on discretionary-immunity grounds on negligence claim where undisputed evidence showed traffic control choices were the result of city's delegated policy decisions
Summary of this case from Robbins v. City of Medforddescribing the holding of Zavalas
Summary of this case from Stone v. WittCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Sep 24, 2002
Citations
334 Or. 631 (Or. 2002)
Citing Cases
Lowery v. City Liquidators
Filed: December 11, 2002. On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Lowery v. City Liquidators, Inc., 334 Or.…
In the Matter of PlattPER CURIAM. Affirmed. Dinsmore v. DMV, 175 Or. App. 509, 28 P.3d 1268 (2001), rev allowed, 334 Or. 631…