holding that, under the 1991 version of the statute, which is identical to the 1983 version, the board is responsible for determining whether an inmate's release should be deferred
Summary of this case from Carter v. Board of Parole1998.
holding that, under the 1991 version of the statute, which is identical to the 1983 version, the board is responsible for determining whether an inmate's release should be deferred
Summary of this case from Carter v. Board of Paroleholding that, regarding claims for employment discrimination under ORS chapter 659, the exclusivity provision of ORS 34.102 was inapplicable
Summary of this case from Butchart v. Baker Countyholding that, regarding claims for employment discrimination under ORS chapter 659, the exclusivity provision of ORS 34.102 was inapplicable
Summary of this case from Pangle v. Bend-Lapine School Districtupholding this aspect of the workers' compensation law against Article I, section 10, challenge
Summary of this case from Brewer v. Dept. of Fish and Wildlifeadopting reasoning inWeidner
Summary of this case from Williams v. Bartlettstating that Oregon courts construe arbitration agreements liberally in favor of arbitrability
Summary of this case from Motsinger v. Lithia Rose-FT, Inc.considering whether possible availability of writ-of-review procedure bars action for unlawful discharge
Summary of this case from Cloyd v. Lebanon School District 16CFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
As has become our style in habeas corpus cases, in this opinion we will refer to the party seeking the writ…
Butchart v. Baker County"[T]his case is not one in which review under ORS 34.010 to ORS 34.102 was unavailable had it been timely…