noting that the goalpost statute required the city to apply on remand the same standards and criteria that applied in the original proceedings where the proceedings on remand were designated by statute as a continuation of the proceedings on the original application
Summary of this case from Griffin Oak Prop. Invs. v. City of Rockaway Beach1998.
noting that the goalpost statute required the city to apply on remand the same standards and criteria that applied in the original proceedings where the proceedings on remand were designated by statute as a continuation of the proceedings on the original application
Summary of this case from Griffin Oak Prop. Invs. v. City of Rockaway Beachnoting trial court's inherent authority to modify order or judgment "so long as it retains jurisdiction over the underlying action"
Summary of this case from Patrick v. OttemanFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Evidence of a prior bad act is admissible if it is relevant “to some material issue in the charged crime.”…
Waremart v. MathiasIn this case, no party asserts that right. Finally, Waremart insists that its initiation of this action…