Summary
striking some or all of a witness's testimony may be an appropriate remedy for that person's refusal to answer questions on cross-examination
Summary of this case from State v. NajibiOpinion
1997.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1997
325 Or. 438 (Or. 1997)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1997
325 Or. 438 (Or. 1997)
striking some or all of a witness's testimony may be an appropriate remedy for that person's refusal to answer questions on cross-examination
Summary of this case from State v. Najibiapplying that standard
Summary of this case from State v. Stricklandaggravating factor (b)(J) “does not condition an upward departure on a finding that a defendant was implicated in or responsible for the greater-than-typical harm that occurred”
Summary of this case from State v. Teixeiratracing history and construction of ORS 174.010
Summary of this case from Young v. StateCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Citations
325 Or. 438 (Or. 1997)
Citing Cases
Wright v. State
We review a grant of summary judgment "to determine whether any genuine issue of material fact exists and…
Saif v. GaffkeClaimant requested a hearing. The administrative law judge (ALJ), relying on Kim E. Danboise, 47 Van Natta…