concluding that a six- to seven-foot tall wooden fence with a metal gate across the driveway was not, standing alone, sufficient to manifest an intent to exclude visitors from going to the front door
Summary of this case from State v. Faught1994.
concluding that a six- to seven-foot tall wooden fence with a metal gate across the driveway was not, standing alone, sufficient to manifest an intent to exclude visitors from going to the front door
Summary of this case from State v. Faughtconcluding that the trial court was required to make factual findings in order to resolve the legal question of whether the state met its burden to show that police officers had lawfully entered private property
Summary of this case from State v. Wilsonconcluding that, under ORS 138.222(d), we could not review his claimed errors on direct appeal
Summary of this case from State v. Davillaconcluding that the trial court was required to make factual findings in order to resolve the legal question of whether the state met its burden to show that police officers had lawfully entered private property
Summary of this case from State v. Wilsonrecognizing that " OEC 609 requires evidence of a prior felony conviction to be admitted in order to impeach a witness"
Summary of this case from State v. Arandasustaining admissibility of expert testimony that "the longer people are in * * * criminal justice system, the more they work over their story" in trial involving a defendant who had been in prison for 18 months
Summary of this case from State v. RemmeFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
" The state argues that the trial court's ruling is contrary to OEC 609(1) and our holding in State v.…
Wohrman v. RogersBecause any action undertaken for the purpose of winding up an LLC presumably would be undertaken with actual…