stating that “there is nothing on the face of the prosecutor's question to indicate that anything other than a response based on [the witness'] personal knowledge was being sought” and “[f]rom the record, it appears that the trial court interpreted defendant's general objection as being directed to the form of the question, and overruled the objection in the exercise of discretion”
Summary of this case from State v. Harris1986
stating that “there is nothing on the face of the prosecutor's question to indicate that anything other than a response based on [the witness'] personal knowledge was being sought” and “[f]rom the record, it appears that the trial court interpreted defendant's general objection as being directed to the form of the question, and overruled the objection in the exercise of discretion”
Summary of this case from State v. HarrisFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
Statements of coconspirators are admissible against other members of the conspiracy so long as a prima facie…
State v. HarrisHowever, there was no indication on the face of the State's questions during direct examination that anything…