Summary
holding that defendant is entitled to a credit based on the principle that plaintiff can have only one recovery for its injury, rather than on a statutory right of contribution
Summary of this case from Baity v. BrewerOpinion
1988
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1988
322 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1988)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1988
322 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1988)
holding that defendant is entitled to a credit based on the principle that plaintiff can have only one recovery for its injury, rather than on a statutory right of contribution
Summary of this case from Baity v. BrewerCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1988
Citations
322 N.C. 113 (N.C. 1988)
Citing Cases
Winston v. Livingstone College, Inc.
In computing time periods designated by the General Statutes, North Carolina courts have held that under Rule…
Tomlinson v. Camel City MotorsIt was also meant to encourage private enforcement and provide a remedy for the aggrieved consumer. Id.;…