Summary
stating that a negligence case is one in which a jury as fact finder ordinarily should decide the reasonableness of a party's actions
Summary of this case from Strickland v. Town of AberdeenOpinion
1985
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
314 N.C. 666 (N.C. 1985)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1985
314 N.C. 666 (N.C. 1985)
stating that a negligence case is one in which a jury as fact finder ordinarily should decide the reasonableness of a party's actions
Summary of this case from Strickland v. Town of AberdeenCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
Citations
314 N.C. 666 (N.C. 1985)
Citing Cases
Strickland v. Town of Aberdeen
As such, a negligence action, with unresolved issues of fact, cannot be properly decided under the…
Rone v. Byrd Food Stores, Inc.Loy v. Lorm Corp., 52 N.C. App. 428, 278 S.E.2d 897 (1981). Summary judgment is a drastic measure, and it…