noting that trial courts have a "duty to maintain control over [class-action] litigation," a "responsibility to control the way in which case proceeds," and discretion to determine "how best to proceed with the litigation"
Summary of this case from Moody v. Sears Roebuck1991
noting that trial courts have a "duty to maintain control over [class-action] litigation," a "responsibility to control the way in which case proceeds," and discretion to determine "how best to proceed with the litigation"
Summary of this case from Moody v. Sears RoebuckFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1991
On 19 March 1991 the Court of Appeals remanded the case for a determination of the threshold issue of whether…
Wilson v. Bellamy"The elements of assault are intent, offer of injury, reasonable apprehension, apparent ability, and imminent…