From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
317 N.C. 714 (N.C. 1986)

Summary

holding that arbitrator's appearance as expert witness for clients of opposing counsel's former law firm was insufficient to establish an objective basis for believing the arbitrator was biased

Summary of this case from Creative Homes and Millwork v. Hinkle

Opinion

1986


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
317 N.C. 714 (N.C. 1986)

holding that arbitrator's appearance as expert witness for clients of opposing counsel's former law firm was insufficient to establish an objective basis for believing the arbitrator was biased

Summary of this case from Creative Homes and Millwork v. Hinkle
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1986

Citations

317 N.C. 714 (N.C. 1986)

Citing Cases

Ruffin Woody and Associates v. Person County

In Gunter, however, the Court was considering the conduct of the arbitrators with regard to the arbitration…

Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Shrader

Thus, as a general rule an arbitration award is presumed valid and the party seeking to vacate it must…