Summary
stating that to assume standing in a child custody dispute, a third party must have a relationship sufficient to show that the third party is not a stranger to the child
Summary of this case from Seyboth v. SeybothOpinion
1998
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1998
349 N.C. 356 (N.C. 1998)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1998
349 N.C. 356 (N.C. 1998)
stating that to assume standing in a child custody dispute, a third party must have a relationship sufficient to show that the third party is not a stranger to the child
Summary of this case from Seyboth v. SeybothCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1998
Citations
349 N.C. 356 (N.C. 1998)
Citing Cases
Smith v. Barbour
As such, the trial court had the authority to enter a temporary custody order. 154 N.C. App. at 409, 571…
Seyboth v. SeybothIn addition, the person claiming standing must show he has a relationship with the child. See Ellison v.…