holding that because the trial court “made a conclusory finding that the evidence would attack defendant's credibility without prejudicial effect,” the finding did not satisfy the “specific facts and circumstances” requirement of Rule 609(b)
Summary of this case from State v. McLeod1986
holding that because the trial court “made a conclusory finding that the evidence would attack defendant's credibility without prejudicial effect,” the finding did not satisfy the “specific facts and circumstances” requirement of Rule 609(b)
Summary of this case from State v. McLeodholding that there was sufficient evidence to establish kidnapping where perpetrators forced victims at gunpoint to the rear of the store where none of the property was kept and it was not necessary to move victims there in order to commit the robbery
Summary of this case from State v. Warrenupholding additional conviction of kidnapping where removal of armed robbery victims to a store dressing room was not an inherent and integral part of the robbery
Summary of this case from State v. Davismoving victims 35 feet at gunpoint prior to binding them constituted crimes of kidnapping and robbery because moving the victims was unnecessary to completion of the robbery
Summary of this case from Brimage v. StateFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
All victims in the case at bar were moved from one room to another room where they were confined. The…
State v. TaylorBrice, 126 N.C. App. at 791, 486 S.E.2d at 720. We believe, however, that this case more closely resembles…