holding that a substantial right was affected when the court granted partial summary judgment regarding the plaintiff's second and third claims, although the plaintiff's first claim remained live, because plaintiff had a substantial right to have all of their factually related claims tried before the same judge and jury
Summary of this case from In re McIntosh1985
holding that a substantial right was affected when the court granted partial summary judgment regarding the plaintiff's second and third claims, although the plaintiff's first claim remained live, because plaintiff had a substantial right to have all of their factually related claims tried before the same judge and jury
Summary of this case from In re McIntoshFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1985
Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLP, 350 N.C. 214, 220, 513 S.E.2d 320, 325 (1999). Cases,…
Vaughan v. MooreBeck v. American Bankers Life Assurance Co. of Florida, 36 N.C. App. 218, 243 S.E.2d 414 (1978). In Olive v.…