Summary
holding breach of promise made to fraudulently induce contract sufficient to sustain a UDTPA claim
Summary of this case from Biosignia, Inc. v. Life Line Screening of Am., Ltd.Opinion
1986
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
318 N.C. 283 (N.C. 1986)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
318 N.C. 283 (N.C. 1986)
holding breach of promise made to fraudulently induce contract sufficient to sustain a UDTPA claim
Summary of this case from Biosignia, Inc. v. Life Line Screening of Am., Ltd.holding breach of promise made to fraudulently induce contract sufficient to sustain a UDTPA claim
Summary of this case from Biosignia, Inc. v. Life Line Screening of Am., Ltd.holding breach of promise made to fraudulently induce contract sufficient to sustain a UDTPA claim
Summary of this case from Stack v. Abbott Labs., Inc.holding that upon a damage verdict favorable to plaintiffs at retrial on their statutory claim and the trial court's determination that the "same course of conduct" gave rise to plaintiffs' breach of contract as well, plaintiffs must elect their damages remedy
Summary of this case from X-It Products v. Walter Kidde Portable Equipment.holding that when agreement to a contract is fraudulently induced by a promise to allow rescission of the contract, breach of that promise is sufficient to sustain an action for UDTP
Summary of this case from Griffith v. Glen Wood Co.requiring election of remedy prior to jury resolution of all issues would be "manifestly unfair"
Summary of this case from Poor v. HillCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
Citations
318 N.C. 283 (N.C. 1986)
Citing Cases
United Laboratories, Inc. v. Kuykendall
That within ten days of the filing of this Judgment, plaintiff shall file a Motion in this cause electing…
In Matter of P.C.H.Finding no indication that the trial court applied an incorrect standard, we affirm the order terminating…