Summary
finding that a plaintiff who did not allege fraud but alleged an existing fiduciary duty stated a claim for unfair and deceptive trade practices based on the defendant's omissions
Summary of this case from City of High Point v. Suez Treatment Sols.Opinion
E.K. Powe, Durham, for defendants.
Lunsford Long, Chapel Hill, J. Jerome Hartzell, Raleigh, for Kron Medical Corp.
Ann M. Kappler, DC, for NACSA.
F. Eugene Hafer, Raleigh, for CAPIA.
Prior report: 107 N.C.App. 331, 420 S.E.2d 192.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of December 1992."
NACSA's Motion in Support of Petition for Discretionary Review has been filed and the following order entered:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of December 1992."
CAPIA's Motion in Support of Petition for Discretionary Review has been filed and the following order entered:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of December 1992."
Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Discretionary Review has been filed and the following order entered: "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of December 1992."