From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 7, 1988
323 N.C. 475 (N.C. 1988)

Summary

discussing N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 60(b)

Summary of this case from Olving v. Olving

Opinion


373 S.E.2d 877 (N.C. 1988) 323 N.C. 475 William James CHANDLER and Myra R. Chandler v. U-LINE CORPORATION v. EATON CORPORATION. No. 497P88. Supreme Court of North Carolina. November 7, 1988

       Petree, Stocktons&s Robinson, Charlotte, for petitioner Eaton Corp.

       W.J. Chandler and Brian deBrun, Charlotte, for plaintiffs.

       Jones, Hewsons&s Woolard, Charlotte, for U-Line.

       ORDER

       Upon consideration of the petition filed by Third-Party Defendant for Writ of Supersedeas and Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"The Third Party-Party Defendant's Motion for Temporary Stay is Allowed pending consideration and determination of its Petition for Discretionary Review. By order of the Court in conference, this the 7th day of November 1988."


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 7, 1988
323 N.C. 475 (N.C. 1988)

discussing N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1, Rule 60(b)

Summary of this case from Olving v. Olving
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 7, 1988

Citations

323 N.C. 475 (N.C. 1988)
323 N.C. 475

Citing Cases

Waldrop v. Young

We agree. Proffered evidence which is merely cumulative or corroborative is not "newly discovered evidence"…

State v. Adams

Having determined that the trial court correctly decided defendant's motion pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule…