stating that a physician-patient relationship between physician and patient "must be shown before any duty of care may be imputed to" the physician, Court held that there was sufficient evidence of such relationship where physician "evaluated plaintiff's physical condition and rendered medical advice to her"
Summary of this case from Mozingo v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital1984
stating that a physician-patient relationship between physician and patient "must be shown before any duty of care may be imputed to" the physician, Court held that there was sufficient evidence of such relationship where physician "evaluated plaintiff's physical condition and rendered medical advice to her"
Summary of this case from Mozingo v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1984
It is well established that the purpose and intent of Rule 26(e) (1) is to prevent a party who has…
Warren v. JacksonState v. Hart, 239 N.C. 709, 711, 80 S.E.2d 901, 903 (1954) (citations omitted). Nonetheless, the connections…