Summary
holding that the trial court properly modified a sentence the day after its entry
Summary of this case from State v. SammartinoOpinion
1992
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1992
332 N.C. 670 (N.C. 1992)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1992
332 N.C. 670 (N.C. 1992)
holding that the trial court properly modified a sentence the day after its entry
Summary of this case from State v. SammartinoCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
332 N.C. 670 (N.C. 1992)
Citing Cases
State v. Watkins
The one-year delay here was not unreasonable in and of itself. See State v. Lea, 156 N.C.App. 178, 180, 576…
State v. UmsteadThese acts of restraint were separate and apart from the acts of rape and sexual offense. See State v.…