From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
318 N.C. 510 (N.C. 1986)

Summary

holding the failure to fill out two aggravating and mitigating factor form sheets is ministerial oversight rather than judicial error when the transcript of the sentencing hearing shows the trial judge made and listed findings supporting the validity of both judgments

Summary of this case from State v. Clark

Opinion

1986


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
318 N.C. 510 (N.C. 1986)

holding the failure to fill out two aggravating and mitigating factor form sheets is ministerial oversight rather than judicial error when the transcript of the sentencing hearing shows the trial judge made and listed findings supporting the validity of both judgments

Summary of this case from State v. Clark
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 1, 1986

Citations

318 N.C. 510 (N.C. 1986)

Citing Cases

State v. Myers

The trial court considered the factors separately for each offense and simply announced the factors jointly.…

State v. Fletcher

On the judgment and commitment form for each offense there is a recital that the court makes findings set…