Summary
stating that "it is . . . well established that the refusal to permit questions which would invoke merely repetitious or cumulative evidence is not error"
Summary of this case from State v. MccoyOpinion
1975
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Certiorari to the Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1975
287 N.C. 468 (N.C. 1975)
Summaries of
Petitions for Certiorari to the Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1975
287 N.C. 468 (N.C. 1975)
stating that "it is . . . well established that the refusal to permit questions which would invoke merely repetitious or cumulative evidence is not error"
Summary of this case from State v. MccoyCase details for
Petitions for Certiorari to the Court of Appeals
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1975
Citations
287 N.C. 468 (N.C. 1975)
Citing Cases
State v. Melvin
A description of an automobile may furnish reasonable grounds for detaining and arresting a criminal suspect.…
State v. MccoyIn light of the essentially cumulative nature of the excluded testimony, we are unable to find that the trial…