Summary
holding that a two-week delay between the admission of prior bad acts evidence and the limiting instruction given as part of the final charge did not constitute plain error
Summary of this case from State v. Araiza-Nava-AvilaOpinion
2000
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Certification
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 1, 2000
165 N.J. 138 (N.J. 2000)
Summaries of
Petitions for Certification
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 1, 2000
165 N.J. 138 (N.J. 2000)
holding that a two-week delay between the admission of prior bad acts evidence and the limiting instruction given as part of the final charge did not constitute plain error
Summary of this case from State v. Araiza-Nava-Avilastating that a PSA is "subject to amendment by the court when changed circumstances make its enforcement inequitable"
Summary of this case from Dunn v. Dunnstating a property settlement agreement is "subject to amendment by the court when changed circumstances make its enforcement inequitable"
Summary of this case from Retik v. Retiknoting that "a prompt delivery of limiting instructions, either before, simultaneously with, or immediately after, the admission of other crimes evidence is preferable, and . . . should be standard procedure"
Summary of this case from State v. BaluchCase details for
Petitions for Certification
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR CERTIFICATION
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Citations
165 N.J. 138 (N.J. 2000)
754 A.2d 1209
Citing Cases
V.S. v. Quartell
Ibid. (quoting Macaluso v. Pleskin, 329 N.J. Super. 346, 350 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 165 N.J. 138…
Vogel v. FernandesPoliseno v. Gen. Motors Corp., 328 N.J. Super. 41, 51 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 165 N.J. 138 (2000). A…