From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 1, 1997
698 A.2d 591 (Pa. 1997)

Opinion

May-July 1997.


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation _____________________ _________ _________ ___________ ____________________

Calabro v. Department of Aging ............ 7/30/97 159 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 689 A.2d 347 (1997) Carlisle Carrier Corp. v. W.C.A.B., (Ward) .. 8/11/97 107 Denied No. 1753 C.D. M.D. 1996 (1997) Chamos Real Estate Co. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Lower Nazareth Tp.; Dilsaver, Petition of ....... 8/11/97 0086 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 688 A.2d 1284 (1997)

Clark v. W.C.A.B. (Pennsylvania Pressed Metals .... 7/8/97 172 Denied No. 1688 C.D. W.D. 1996 (1997)

Com., Dept. of Commerce v. Carlow 7/18/97 060-062 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 687 A.2d 22 (1997)

Conti v. Board of Sup'rs of Tp. of Pine ............. 7/25/97 0104 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 688 A.2d 1284 (1997)

Davis v. City of Pittsburgh, Claims Div. ...... 6/26/97 0029 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 687 A.2d 433 (1997)

Delaware County Lodge No. 27 v. Com. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd. .............. 8/11/97 0172 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., M.D. 690 A.2d 754 (1997)

Envirotrol, Inc. v. Darlington Tp. .... 7/11/97 076 Denied No. 3374 C.D. W.D. 1996 (1997)

Goldstein v. Com. Dept. of Transp. Bureau of Driver Licensing ........ 7/18/97 089 Denied Pa.Cmwlth., W.D. 686 A.2d 43 (1997)


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jul 1, 1997
698 A.2d 591 (Pa. 1997)
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:DISPOSITIONS OF PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 1, 1997

Citations

698 A.2d 591 (Pa. 1997)
698 A.2d 591

Citing Cases

Narcotics Agents v. Pennsylvania Labor Bd.

We initially note that this Court's scope of review of the Board's order is limited to determining whether…

County of Lebanon v. Board

Similarly, park police were denied the right to bargain under Act 111 because those employees were not…