Summary
finding that a murder victim's statements regarding the breakdown of her relationship with the defendant and her stated intent to remove defendant from her life were admissible under the state-of-mind exception because they allowed the jury to infer defendant's possible motive
Summary of this case from Com. v. MitchellOpinion
May-July 1996.
Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation _______________________ _______ _________ ___________ ___________
Com. v. Panner ......... 7/15/96 682 Denied 449 Pa.Super. W.D. 699, (1995) 673 A.2d 404
Com. v. Payne .......... 7/22/96 0068 Denied 449 Pa.Super. W.D. 725, (1996) 674 A.2d 318
Com. v. Renno .......... 8/14/96 172 Denied 451 Pa.Super. M.D. 577, (1996) 677 A.2d 1267
Com. v. Riggleman ...... 8/12/96 0269 Denied 451 Pa.Super. M.D. 602, (1996) 678 A.2d 833
Com. v. Rippy .......... 7/23/96 0600 Denied 434 Pa.Super. W.D. 722, (1995) 643 A.2d 708
Com. v. Rogers ......... 7/12/96 608 Denied 448 Pa.Super. W.D. 655, (1995) 671 A.2d 772
Com. v. Rutledge ....... 7/22/96 0120 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 577, (1996) 677 A.2d 1267
Com. v. Schmitt ........ 7/22/96 0135 Denied 450 Pa.Super. M.D. 717, (1996) 676 A.2d 285
Com. v. Simpson ........ 7/24/96 153, 159 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 577, (1996) 677 A.2d 1267
Com. v. Smith .......... 8/1/96 161 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 578, (1996) 677 A.2d 1267
Com. v. Sneeringer ..... 8/13/96 77 M.D. Denied 447 Pa.Super. (1996) 241, 668 A.2d 1167
Com. v. Snyder ......... 7/11/96 152 Denied 451 Pa.Super. W.D. 578, (1996) 677 A.2d 1268
Com. v. Sonoski ........ 8/7/96 215 Denied 451 Pa.Super. M.D. 604, (1996) 678 A.2d 835
Com. v. Tate ........... 7/22/96 008 Denied 449 Pa.Super. W.D. 727, (1996) 674 A.2d 320
Com. v. Taylor ......... 7/2/96 0133 Denied 450 Pa.Super. E.D. 719,
(1996) 676 A.2d 286