From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1989
522 Pa. 584 (Pa. 1989)

Summary

stating that complaining party must demonstrate prejudice to proper preparation of case for trial as result of dilatory disclosure

Summary of this case from Wolloch v. Aiken

Opinion

1989


Allocatur Disposition Lower Court Docket and Appeal Docket or Title Date Number Docket Citation ___________________________________________________________________________

Com. ex rel. Buchanan v. Verbonitz ...... 4/26/89 1009 E.D. Granted No. 343 M.D. No. (1988) (63 E.D. 15 1989) Hower v. Whitmak Associates ........ 4/17/89 327 E.D. Denied 371 Pa. Super. 443, (1988) 538 A.2d 524

Hower v. Whitmak Associates ........ 4/17/89 403 E.D. Denied 371 Pa. Super. 443, (1988) 538 A.2d 524

Kearns by Kearns v. Dehaas ............ 4/25/89 880 E.D. Denied 377 Pa. Super. 200, (1988) 546 A.2d 1226

Langan v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co....... 5/22/89 241 M.D. Denied 376 Pa. Super. 372, (1988) 546 A.2d 75

Mahaffey v. Mahaffey 5/23/89 159 M.D. Denied 378 Pa. Super. 656, (1988) 544 A.2d 1048

Okocha v. Peffley ... 5/30/89 225 M.D. Denied 382 Pa. Super. 653, (1988) 549 A.2d 1347

Packer v. Packer .... 4/25/89 946 E.D. Denied 383 Pa. Super. 673, (1988) 550 A.2d 255

R R Paving Co., Inc., Petition of ....... 4/17/89 403 E.D. Denied 371 Pa. Super. 443, (1988) 538 A.2d 524

Ricks by Ricks v. Alburger .......... 5/4/89 25 E.D. Denied 386 Pa. Super. 659, (1989) 555 A.2d 946

Rosenthal v. Verlin . 12/28/88 646 E.D. Denied No. 1278 (1988) Philadelphia 1988

Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co....... 5/31/89 661 W.D. Granted 385 Pa. Super. 664, (1988) (49, 50, 51, 555 A.2d 254 52 W.D. 1989)

Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co....... 5/31/89 680 W.D. Granted 385 Pa. Super. 664, (1988) (53, 54, 55, 555 A.2d 254 56 W.D. 1989)

Ruzzi v. Zinsser .... 5/31/89 661 W.D. Granted 385 Pa. Super. 664, (1988) (49, 50, 51, 555 A.2d 254 52 W.D. 1989)

Shockey, Petition of ................ 5/31/89 680 W.D. Granted 385 Pa. Super. 664, (1988) (53, 54, 55, 555 A.2d 254 56 W.D. 1989)

Simeone v. Simeone .. 5/23/89 50 E.D. Granted 380 Pa. Super. 37, (1989) (70 E.D. 551 A.2d 219 1989)


Summaries of

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1989
522 Pa. 584 (Pa. 1989)

stating that complaining party must demonstrate prejudice to proper preparation of case for trial as result of dilatory disclosure

Summary of this case from Wolloch v. Aiken
Case details for

Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 1, 1989

Citations

522 Pa. 584 (Pa. 1989)

Citing Cases

Wolloch v. Aiken

In balancing these factors as they relate to each party, the court must examine the relative prejudice, which…

Szabo v. Bryn Mawr Hospital

In addition, the record must be examined in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, accepting as…