Summary
holding that a state trooper acting within the scope of his duties is protected by sovereign immunity from intentional infliction of emotional distress claims
Summary of this case from Colon v. KenwallOpinion
1995
holding that a state trooper acting within the scope of his duties is protected by sovereign immunity from intentional infliction of emotional distress claims
Summary of this case from Colon v. Kenwall1995
holding that a state trooper acting within the scope of his duties is protected by sovereign immunity from intentional infliction of emotional distress claims
Summary of this case from Colon v. Kenwallholding that a state trooper acting within the scope of his duties is protected by sovereign immunity from intentional infliction of emotional distress claims
Summary of this case from Palmer v. Pa. State PoliceFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
See, e.g., International Association of Fire Fighters, Local 1803 v. City of Reading, 160 Pa.Cmwlth. 627, 635…
Westinghouse v. Dept. of Envir. ProtectionWestinghouse notes that none of DEP's fact witnesses testified to mishandling of industrial wastes any later…