Summary
holding order directing QDRO did not affect either party's substantive rights but was simply procedural mechanism to effectuate pension entitlement as agreed to by parties
Summary of this case from Conway v. ConwayOpinion
1997
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
546 Pa. 681 (Pa. 1997)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1997
546 Pa. 681 (Pa. 1997)
holding order directing QDRO did not affect either party's substantive rights but was simply procedural mechanism to effectuate pension entitlement as agreed to by parties
Summary of this case from Conway v. ConwayCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Citations
546 Pa. 681 (Pa. 1997)
Citing Cases
Yacoub v. Lehigh Valley Med. Assoc
In order to meet her burden of proof, Appellant was required to provide expert testimony to establish, to a…
Wolloch v. AikenEaddy, supra at 642 (internal citations omitted). See also Gregorio v. Zeluck, 678 A.2d 810 (Pa.Super. 1996),…