From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 3, 1987
511 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. BR-341.

September 3, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Leon County; Charles McClure, Judge.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Pamela D. Presnell, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Kurt L. Barch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


In sentencing appellant as an adult, the trial court failed to comply with the requirements of Section 39.111(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (1986 Supp.), which mandates that, when sentencing a juvenile as an adult, the trial court must explain in writing why adult sanctions are suitable, treating the criteria set forth in Section 39.111(7)(c). The sentence must therefore be reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing. State v. Rhoden, 448 So.2d 1013 (Fla. 1984); Addison v. State, 503 So.2d 961 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Banks v. State, 488 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

REVERSED and REMANDED for resentencing.

MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peterson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 3, 1987
511 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Peterson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALPHONSO PETERSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 3, 1987

Citations

511 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)