From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-11-8

In the Matter of Brian PETERSON, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Brian Peterson, Stormville, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura Etlinger of counsel), for respondent.


Brian Peterson, Stormville, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Laura Etlinger of counsel), for respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of drug use and a family reunion violation. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Inasmuch as it has been demonstrated that petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Scott v. Fischer, 95 A.D.3d 1576, 943 N.Y.S.2d 921 [2012];Matter of Jackson v. Prack, 89 A.D.3d 1297, 932 N.Y.S.2d 739 [2011] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ROSE, J.P., LAHTINEN, MALONE JR., STEIN and McCARTHY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 8, 2012
100 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Peterson v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Brian PETERSON, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 8, 2012

Citations

100 A.D.3d 1124 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7351
952 N.Y.S.2d 918

Citing Cases

Lopez v. Fischer

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed,…