From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Pierce

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Nov 21, 2013
841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)

Opinion

No. 20130164.

2013-11-21

Carrie PETERSON, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Mara PIERCE, and all others in possession, Defendants Mara Pierce Appellant.


[¶ 1] Mara Pierce appealed from a money judgment entered by the district court following an eviction hearing. Pierce argues the district court erred in concluding she did not make an effective rent payment by placing $1,400 cash in her landlord's unsecured mailbox. The district court found Pierce placed the cash in her landlord's mailbox, but that the landlord did not receive it. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DALE V. SANDSTROM, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, and CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Pierce

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Nov 21, 2013
841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)
Case details for

Peterson v. Pierce

Case Details

Full title:Carrie PETERSON, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Mara PIERCE, and all others in…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)
2013 N.D. 198

Citing Cases

Bell v. Peabody

This purpose is better effected by the registry." Parsons, C. J., in Wells v. Prince, 4 Mass. 68. That this…