From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peterson v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 5, 1959
267 F.2d 496 (3d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 12863.

Argued May 28, 1959.

Decided June 5, 1959.

John P.S. O'Connor, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Evans, Ivory Evans, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph J. Lee, Clearfield, Pa. (Sherman T. Rock, Andrew C. Van Gorder, Paul, Lawrence Rock, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.


This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action in tort for want of prosecution. The case was here once before, but we dismissed because there was no final judgment, but instead an outstanding order for a new trial. 3d Cir., 1958, 254 F.2d 853. We think that the subsequent proceedings may have been influenced by a misunderstanding on the part of the plaintiff or his counsel, and that the ends of fairness will be best served by vacating the judgment entered under Rule 41(b) F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., and sending the case back for a new trial if the plaintiff so desires.

The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case remanded.


Summaries of

Peterson v. Moore

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jun 5, 1959
267 F.2d 496 (3d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Peterson v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:George PETERSON, Appellant, v. Herman S. MOORE

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jun 5, 1959

Citations

267 F.2d 496 (3d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

MELY v. MORRIS

2B Barron Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Procedure § 917, at 136 (rules ed. Wright rev. 1961). Typical of the…

Cherry v. Brown-Frazier-Whitney

Bush v. United States Postal Serv., 496 F.2d 42, 44-45 (4th Cir. 1974); Stanley v. Alcock, 310 F.2d 17, 20…