From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petersen v. Simon

Supreme Court of Montana
Aug 27, 2024
DA 23-0170 (Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)

Opinion

DA 23-0170

08-27-2024

MONTY CLARENCE PETERSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JENNIFER J. SIMON, APRN, Defendant and Appellee.


ORDER

Appellant, Monty Clarence Petersen, moves this Court for leave to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Mont. R. App. P. 12(10). Appellee, Jennifer J. Simon, APRN, opposes Petersen's motion.

Petersen seeks leave to file a supplemental brief to address this Court's recently issued Opinion in Estate of Phillips v. Robbins, 2024 MT 174, __ Mont. __, __P.3d __. Petersen asserts that "[t]here exist factual and legal differences between the instant case and Phillips, which [Petersen] would like an opportunity to explain."

"Motions to file ... supplemental briefs will not be routinely granted. Motions to file such briefs must be supported by an affidavit demonstrating extraordinary justification." Mont. R. App. P. 12(10). This Court is obviously well aware of our Opinion in Phillips and the factual and legal differences between this case and Phillips. Those differences are substantively addressed in our Opinion, issued contemporaneously with this Order. Therefore, Appellant's Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Briefing is DENIED.


Summaries of

Petersen v. Simon

Supreme Court of Montana
Aug 27, 2024
DA 23-0170 (Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)
Case details for

Petersen v. Simon

Case Details

Full title:MONTY CLARENCE PETERSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. JENNIFER J. SIMON…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: Aug 27, 2024

Citations

DA 23-0170 (Mont. Aug. 27, 2024)