From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. State Farm Fire Cas. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 2003
100 N.Y.2d 634 (N.Y. 2003)

Opinion

166

October 30, 2003.

Submitted by Todd W. Gustafson, for appellant.

Submitted by Robert M. Shaddock, for respondent.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to defendant, by granting judgment declaring that defendant has no duty to indemnify in connection with the underlying personal injury action and, as so modified, affirmed (see Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, cert denied 371 U.S. 901). State Farm demonstrated as a matter of law that the policy exclusion for "bodily injury," which is either "expected or intended by an insured" or "which is the result of willful and malicious acts of an insured," precludes coverage of the incident at issue (see Allstate Ins. Co. v. Mugavero, 79 N.Y.2d 153). Moreover, State Farm, which learned of the claim in January 1992 and issued reservation of rights letters in February, concluded its investigation and timely disclaimed coverage based on the policy exclusion on April 9, 1992.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules, order modified, with costs to defendant, by declaring that defendant has no duty to indemnify in connection with the underlying personal injury action and, as so modified, affirmed, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Peters v. State Farm Fire Cas. Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 30, 2003
100 N.Y.2d 634 (N.Y. 2003)
Case details for

Peters v. State Farm Fire Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY BRUCE PETERS, Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 30, 2003

Citations

100 N.Y.2d 634 (N.Y. 2003)
769 N.Y.S.2d 195
801 N.E.2d 416

Citing Cases

Tower Ins. Co. of New York v. Duarte

It is well settled that an insurer may be relieved of its duty to defend and indemnify its insured "where it…

Smith v. New York Central Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

At his examination before trial in this action, plaintiff testified that he pursued Perhach believing that he…