From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pesner v. Fried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

October 9, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.).


Ordered that the appeal by Joel R. Fried, D.D.S., is dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see, CPLR 5511); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiffs attempted to serve the defendant Shandler pursuant to the substituted service provisions of CPLR 308 (2). However, the requisite mailing did not bear the legend "personal and confidential" on the envelope as required by the statute (see, CPLR 308). Since the plaintiffs failed to comply with the prescribed conditions, jurisdiction over Shandler was not acquired, and the complaint was properly dismissed as to him (see, Broomes-Simon v. Klebanow, 160 A.D.2d 973). Kooper, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pesner v. Fried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 9, 1990
166 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Pesner v. Fried

Case Details

Full title:KAREN PESNER et al., Appellants, v. JOEL R. FRIED, Appellant, and HARVEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 9, 1990

Citations

166 A.D.2d 512 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 795

Citing Cases

Einheber v. Bodenheimer

Thus, plaintiff has not demonstrated that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Drs. Glabman or Squire…

Borges v. Entra Am., Inc.

When the mailing is made to the defendant's actual place of business, the envelope must be labeled "personal…