From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pesch v. Progressive Nw. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 29, 2021
CIVIL ACTION 20-288-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 29, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 20-288-SDD-EWD

03-29-2021

PESCH v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.


RULING

The Court has carefully considered the Motion , the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes, dated February 23, 2021, to which no objection was filed.

Rec. Doc. 10.

Rec. Doc. 19. --------

The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's herein.

ACCORDINGLY, the Motion to Remand is hereby GRANTED, IN PART, and this matter is to be REMANDED to the Twenty-Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, State of Louisiana, as it was untimely removed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's request for an award of costs and attorneys' fees under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) is hereby DENIED.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana on March 29, 2021.

/s/ _________

CHIEF JUDGE SHELLY D. DICK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Pesch v. Progressive Nw. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Mar 29, 2021
CIVIL ACTION 20-288-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 29, 2021)
Case details for

Pesch v. Progressive Nw. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PESCH v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Mar 29, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 20-288-SDD-EWD (M.D. La. Mar. 29, 2021)

Citing Cases

Morgan v. West

Furthermore, a written interrogatory response by plaintiffs that their damages exceed the jurisdictional…

Cedotal v. Drive N.J. Ins. Co.

“There is no doubt that, if Plaintiff had put a statement in the Petition that his damages exceeded the…