From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 3, 2006
927 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Opinion

No. 1D05-3344.

May 3, 2006.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. David A. Glant, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Charlie Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Sherri Tolar Rollison, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


A simple "hearsay" objection fails to preserve the argument that one's Sixth Amendment confrontation right has been violated. See Mencos v. State, 909 So.2d 349, 351 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ("The right of confrontation guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment `differs from the kind of protection that is afforded by state evidence rules governing the admission of hearsay.'" (quoting Lopez v. State, 888 So.2d 693, 697 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004))).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, C.J., WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perry v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 3, 2006
927 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)
Case details for

Perry v. State

Case Details

Full title:Frank L. PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 3, 2006

Citations

927 So. 2d 228 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Randall v. State

Randall also argues that the introduction of the victim's dying declaration violated his Sixth Amendment…

Randall v. State

Randall also argues that the introduction of the victim's dying declaration violated his Sixth Amendment…