From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 6, 1996
224 A.D.2d 208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 6, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.).


Under the circumstances presented, where the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority had timely, actual knowledge of the essential facts underlying the infant plaintiff's claim, leave to file a late notice of claim should have been granted absent any showing of prejudice to defendant ( see, Matter of Morgan v. New York City Hous. Auth., 181 A.D.2d 890).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Rubin, Kupferman and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Perry v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 6, 1996
224 A.D.2d 208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Perry v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit

Case Details

Full title:AUDRIANA PERRY et al., Appellants, v. MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 6, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 208 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 296