From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Louisiana

U.S.
Nov 13, 1990
498 U.S. 38 (1990)

Summary

In Perry, this court stated that the state will not impose the death penalty on a person who becomes insane subsequent to his conviction for first degree murder if he "lacks the capacity to understand the death penalty."

Summary of this case from State v. Perry

Opinion

CERTIORARI TO THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA

No. 89-5120

Argued October 2, 1990 Decided November 13, 1990

Vacated and remanded.

Keith B. Nordyke argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were June E. Denlinger and Joe Giarrusso, Jr.

Rene I. Salomon, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and M. Patricia Jones, Assistant Attorney General.

Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed by the American Psychiatric Association et al. by Joel N. Onek, Richard G. Taranto, Carter G. Phillips, and Kirk B. Johnson; and for the Coalition for Fundamental Rights and Equality of Ex-patients by Peter Margulies.


The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 19th Judicial District Court of Louisiana for further consideration in light of Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990)

It is so ordered.

JUSTICE SOUTER took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Perry v. Louisiana

U.S.
Nov 13, 1990
498 U.S. 38 (1990)

In Perry, this court stated that the state will not impose the death penalty on a person who becomes insane subsequent to his conviction for first degree murder if he "lacks the capacity to understand the death penalty."

Summary of this case from State v. Perry
Case details for

Perry v. Louisiana

Case Details

Full title:PERRY v . LOUISIANA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 13, 1990

Citations

498 U.S. 38 (1990)
111 S. Ct. 449

Citing Cases

State v. Perry

The prisoner did not consent to medication, but applied for review by this court, which denied writs, 543…

Weeks v. Jones

As a precautionary measure, however, the defense motion is granted; and the Court ORDERS that the State of…