Perry v. Bristol Meyer Squib

Full title: Kevin L. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRISTOL MEYER SQUIB, a public…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2002

31 F. App'x 445 (9th Cir. 2002)

Opinion

31 Fed.Appx. 445 (9th Cir. 2002) Kevin L. PERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRISTOL MEYER SQUIB, a public corporation; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-55181. D.C. No. CV-99-01099-IEG. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 25, 2002

Submitted February 11, 2002. ^*

* This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Irma E. Gonzalez, District Judge, Presiding.

Before B. FLETCHER, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Kevin L. Perry appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion, Allmerica Fin. Life Ins. & Annuity Co. v. Llewellyn, 139 F.3d 664, 665 (9th Cir.1997), and we affirm because none of the applicable grounds for relief exists in this case, see Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah County v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993).

Perry's additional contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.