Summary
affirming district court's dismissal of Perlmutter's and Bolick's complaint and denial of their motions for reconsideration and recusal
Summary of this case from Perlmutter v. VaroneOpinion
No. 20-2192
05-25-2021
DAWN PERLMUTTER; THOMAS M. BOLICK, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. TRINA VARONE; JEFFREY VARONE; SCOTT PERLMUTTER; GARY ALTMAN; ALTMAN & ASSOCIATES; SUTTON INVESTMENTS LLC, Defendants - Appellees.
Dawn Perlmutter, Thomas M. Bolick, Appellants Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paula Xinis, District Judge. (8:19-cv-03402-PX) Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dawn Perlmutter, Thomas M. Bolick, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's orders granting Defendants' motions to dismiss, denying Appellants' motion for reconsideration, and denying Appellants' motion for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Perlmutter v. Varone, No. 8:19-cv-03402-PX (D. Md. June 1, 2020; Oct. 13, 2020). We further reject Appellants' contention that 4th Cir. R. 46(f) is unconstitutional and note that we have fully considered the record on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED