From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 2, 2011
53 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Summary

refusing to address scrivener's error in the written judgments and sentences “because it was not preserved either before this appeal by objection in the trial court or while this appeal was pending by the filing of a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) ”

Summary of this case from Latson v. State

Opinion

No. 2D09-3645.

February 2, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Mark Steinbeck, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Clifford Lee Perkins, Jr., pleaded no contest in three separate cases to four counts of sale or delivery of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school and four counts of possession of cocaine. Prior to sentencing, Perkins moved to withdraw his plea; however, the trial court denied this motion after a hearing. The court then orally sentenced Perkins to concurrent terms of 108 months in prison on each of the sale or delivery counts and sixty months in prison on each of the possession counts.

We affirm Perkins' convictions without further comment. However, we note that there appears to be a scrivener's error in the written judgments and sentences, two of which indicate a sentence of 180 months — rather than 108 months — on the sale or delivery convictions. We cannot address this apparent error in this appeal because it was not preserved either before this appeal by objection in the trial court or while this appeal was pending by the filing of a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2). Therefore, we must affirm Perkins' sentences. However, our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Perkins may have to raise this apparent error in the trial court.

NORTHCUTT and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Perkins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Feb 2, 2011
53 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

refusing to address scrivener's error in the written judgments and sentences “because it was not preserved either before this appeal by objection in the trial court or while this appeal was pending by the filing of a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) ”

Summary of this case from Latson v. State
Case details for

Perkins v. State

Case Details

Full title:Clifford Lee PERKINS, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Feb 2, 2011

Citations

53 So. 3d 1141 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

Carrion v. State

Here, the error "was not preserved either before this appeal by objection in the trial court or while this…

Latson v. State

Because Appellant did not raise this claim to the trial court either by objection at sentencing or by motion…