From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 25, 2015
129 A.D.3d 1421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

06-25-2015

In the Matter of Paris PERKINS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Paris Perkins, Attica, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.


Paris Perkins, Attica, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A search of petitioner's cell disclosed a correction officer's “baseball style cap” that was hidden inside of a box of rice. As a result, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of escape items, possession of contraband, property damage or loss and possession of employee property. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty as charged. The determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal with a modified penalty, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, coupled with the testimony of its author who conducted the cell search, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Nieves v. Annucci, 123 A.D.3d 1368, 1368, 997 N.Y.S.2d 847 [2014] ; Matter of Matthews v. Fischer, 109 A.D.3d 1038, 1038, 971 N.Y.S.2d 367 [2013] ). Petitioner's denial of the charges presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Starling v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 A.D.3d 1195, 1196, 996 N.Y.S.2d 403 [2014] ; Matter of Grant v. Rock, 122 A.D.3d 1225, 1226, 997 N.Y.S.2d 541 [2014] ). Significantly, a reasonable inference of possession arose by virtue of the fact that the item was found in an area within petitioner's control (see Matter of Nieves v. Annucci, 123 A.D.3d at 1368–1369, 997 N.Y.S.2d 847 ; Matter of Aguirre v. Fischer, 111 A.D.3d 1219, 1220, 975 N.Y.S.2d 814 [2013] ).

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

PETERS, P.J., McCARTHY, EGAN JR. and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perkins v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 25, 2015
129 A.D.3d 1421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Perkins v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Paris PERKINS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 25, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 1421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5550
10 N.Y.S.3d 908

Citing Cases

Wood v. Annucci

of the weapon and the hearing testimony of the correction officer who found it provide substantial evidence…

Slater v. Annucci

The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, and petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78…