From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 15, 2007
958 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 5D06-3405.

June 15, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Seminole County, O.H. Eaton, Jr., J.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender and Rose M. Levering, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Daniel Perez, DeFuniak Springs, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Daniel Perez appeals from the trial court's order revoking his probation and sentencing him to a term of 40 months in prison. Although the trial court issued a ruling from the bench finding that the defendant had violated his probation and stating the conditions which had been violated, the trial court failed to enter an order that set forth in writing the conditions that were found to have been violated. Since the trial court's findings are supported by competent, substantial evidence and, if reduced to writing, would be adequate to sustain the trial court's conclusion of a willful and substantial violation of probation, we affirm the revocation of probation, but remand the matter for entry of a proper order. See Patt v. State, 876 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED, REMANDED for entry of proper order.

PLEUS, C.J. and TORPY, J., concur


Summaries of

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jun 15, 2007
958 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Perez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daniel PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jun 15, 2007

Citations

958 So. 2d 1076 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Woodman v. State

However, because the written order on appeal does not set forth the specific condition of probation that was…

Knight v. State

We therefore remand this matter for the entry of a proper order specifying the condition of probation…