From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 14, 2019
278 So. 3d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. 3D18-1914

08-14-2019

Jose T. PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Dennis Gonzalez Jr., P.A., and Dennis Gonzalez, Jr., Miami, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Dennis Gonzalez Jr., P.A., and Dennis Gonzalez, Jr., Miami, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Lorenzo, 271 So. 3d 77, 78 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) ("[T]he defendant must satisfy the requirement in rule 3.850(b)(1) by alleging and proving that the fact that the plea subjected the defendant to deportation could not have been ascertained during the two-year period with the exercise of due diligence. It will not be enough to allege that the defendant learned of the possibility of deportation only upon the commencement of deportation proceedings after the two-year limitations period has expired. The requirement of due diligence compels the defendant to allege and prove that affirmative steps were taken in an attempt to discover the effect of the plea on his or her residency status." (quoting State v. Green, 944 So. 2d 208, 218 (Fla. 2006) )).


Summaries of

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 14, 2019
278 So. 3d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Perez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jose T. PEREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Aug 14, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 248 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)